Member-only story

Power Sharing in Lebanon: A Complex and Fragile Balance

Fabian Mitchell

·19.7k Followers· Follow

Published in Power Sharing In Lebanon: Consociationalism Since 1820 (Routledge Studies In Middle Eastern Politics)

5 min read · 2 weeks before

500 View Claps

63 Respond

Save

Listen

Lebanon's power-sharing system is a complex and fragile balance of power among its various religious and ethnic groups. This system has been in place since the country's independence in 1943, and has been credited with helping to prevent Lebanon from falling into civil war. However, the system has also been criticized for being too rigid and for failing to adequately represent the country's changing demographics.

The power-sharing system is based on the National Pact, an unwritten agreement between Lebanon's two main religious communities, the Maronite Christians and the Sunni Muslims. The National Pact divides power between these two communities, with the Maronites holding the presidency, the Sunnis holding the premiership, and the Shia Muslims holding the speakership of parliament. Other religious and ethnic groups are also represented in the government, but to a lesser extent.

Power Sharing in Lebanon: Consociationalism Since 1820 (Routledge Studies in Middle Eastern Politics)

by Hourly History

4.3 out of 5

Language	:	English
File size	:	889 KB
Text-to-Speech	:	Enabled
Screen Reader	:	Supported
Enhanced typesetting	:	Enabled
Print length	:	228 pages

The power-sharing system has been relatively successful in preventing Lebanon from falling into civil war. However, the system has also been criticized for being too rigid and for failing to adequately represent the country's changing demographics. In recent years, there have been growing calls for reform of the power-sharing system, but there is no consensus on what form this reform should take.

The National Pact

The National Pact is the foundation of Lebanon's power-sharing system. It was an unwritten agreement between Lebanon's two main religious communities, the Maronite Christians and the Sunni Muslims, reached in 1943. The National Pact divides power between these two communities, with the Maronites holding the presidency, the Sunnis holding the premiership, and the Shia Muslims holding the speakership of parliament. Other religious and ethnic groups are also represented in the government, but to a lesser extent.

The National Pact has been credited with helping to prevent Lebanon from falling into civil war. However, the system has also been criticized for being too rigid and for failing to adequately represent the country's changing demographics. In recent years, there have been growing calls for reform of the power-sharing system, but there is no consensus on what form this reform should take.

The Power-Sharing System in Practice

The power-sharing system is implemented through a complex system of quotas and vetoes. Each religious community has a certain number of seats in parliament and in the cabinet. In addition, each community has a veto over certain decisions. For example, the Maronite president has a veto over the appointment of the prime minister, and the Sunni prime minister has a veto over the appointment of the speaker of parliament.

This system of quotas and vetoes has helped to ensure that no single community can dominate the government. However, it has also made it difficult for the government to make decisions. In recent years, there have been several cases where the government has been paralyzed because one community has vetoed a decision that was supported by the other communities.

Challenges to the Power-Sharing System

The power-sharing system is facing a number of challenges. One challenge is the country's changing demographics. The Maronite Christian community, which has traditionally held the presidency, is declining in size. At the same time, the Shia Muslim community, which has traditionally held the speakership of parliament, is growing in size. This demographic shift is putting pressure on the power-sharing system, as it is becoming increasingly difficult to maintain the delicate balance of power between the different communities.

Another challenge to the power-sharing system is the rise of political sectarianism. In recent years, there has been a growing tendency for political parties to appeal to their sectarian base. This has made it more difficult for the government to make decisions that are in the best interests of the country as a whole.

Lebanon's power-sharing system is a complex and fragile balance of power. It has been successful in preventing Lebanon from falling into civil war, but it is facing a number of challenges. The country's changing demographics and the rise of political sectarianism are putting pressure on the system, and it is unclear whether it will be able to withstand these challenges.

If the power-sharing system collapses, Lebanon could be plunged into civil war. This would have devastating consequences for the country and for the region as a whole. It is therefore essential that the international community support Lebanon's power-sharing system and help it to overcome the challenges it faces.

Power Sharing in Lebanon: Consociationalism Since 1820 (Routledge Studies in Middle Eastern Politics)

by Hourly History

4.3 out of 5